We are dedicated to our clients and fight hard to achieve the best results possible. Read through some of our victories through the years.
Client’s blood was drawn, which results in alcohol concentration of 0.09% and client is charged with felony DUI causing serious bodily injury...
The client was a commercial truck driver detained for driving too slowly in the passing lane of Interstate...
The client allegedly made an abrupt turn into a hotel parking lot and was immediately contacted by law enforcement,,,
Client called in by wife for drinking too much and appearing to be attempting to drive away. Responding officers claim...
Case: Client stopped for speeding by Wyoming Highway Patrol and is charged with possession of controlled substance-marijuana; and, being under the influence of drugs (DUID) (marijuana). After receiving discovery file pretrial motions in the case. State agrees cannot prove the DUID charge and agrees to consent to first offender treatment for client's possession of controlled substance charge.Result: DUID charge is dismissed and client is granted deferred prosecution of possession of controlled substance charge.
On New Years Day in 2011, the City of Laramie began enforcing its new "aggravated offender" DUI ordinance, which created minimum mandatory jail sentences for anyone accused of having a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) result of 0.15% or more. The minimum mandatory jail sentences were significantly harsher than the sentences created for the exact same behavior under Wyoming's DUI law.
Case: Client was arrested and charged with DWUIJury Verdict: GuiltyAppeal: After denying Mr. Vang's client's request to have the following question certified to the Wyoming Supreme Court: "If, under Missouri v. McNeely, the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream does not establish a per se exigency, does W.S. § 31-6-102(a)(i) facially violate Article 1 § 4 of the Wyoming Constitution and the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution?"; the District Court overturned the DUI conviction holding that Wyoming's implied consent law did not apply to the facts of the case, given the lack of evidence to place the accused upon a "public street or highway", which is a necessary condition for admitting a chemical test result in a DUI case pursuant to Wyoming's implied consent law.
Case: Client was arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol (DWUI), after the client was discovered trying to remove a vehicle from a ditch. Client admits to talking on cell phone resulting in loss of control on a dirt road. Client cited with failure to maintain a single lane of travel and client allegedly provided a BAC result of 0.13% on the Intoximeter EC/IR.Outcome: Not Guilty on all charges